#6 CORE MAC PRO VS 8 CORE FOR AFTER EFFECTS FULL#

Rendering the project after applying the effects and analyzing the color took 80 seconds on that Retina MacBook Pro, but just under 40 seconds on the new Mac Pro.Д¬heck back soon for our full review of the new Mac Pro.

The Retina MacBook Pro, with its speedy PCIe connected flash, imported the footage in an impressive time, but the new Mac Pro was still 23 percent faster. That was about one-third the time it took to for the 2013 CTO iMac with Fusion Drive to import the footage. Importing took around 131 seconds on the 2012 quad-core Mac Pro, but just under 16 seconds on the new Mac Pro. It has hyperthreading so that means there are 4 virtual cores + 4 actual cores 8 core. I was thinking of building a new machine with the i7 extreme processor-3.2 ghz. Which ever one i get, i will be getting a 3.0 and 4 gigs of ram. I have been looking at both the quad core and 8 core mac pros and i wasnt sure if i have a huge advantage in getting the 8 core. I am a video editer who uses processor intensive programs such as after effects and motion. For all this though, the device is still a contradiction.

#6 CORE MAC PRO VS 8 CORE FOR AFTER EFFECTS FULL VERSION#

Thanks 2.3GHz Processor 128GB Storage 2. Twixtor plugin for after effects cs4 free download full version Twixtor Pro 6.1 for After Effects (REVisionFX). Hey guys I have a Mac Pro 8-core system running cubase 4. ANy way, i am in the process of buying a new mac pro. The Mac Pro 8-core is indeed a machine of vast power, and one that every member of the Macworld team would jump at owning. To see how well the computer handles 4K video, we turned off background processing and timed how long it took to import 60 seconds worth of 3840-by-2086 clips into a 4K project, apply a couple of filters, and balance the color of the clips. Does anyone know if the Macbook pro will run after effects smoothly I put the specs of the laptop below. AppleвЂ™s iMovie application takes advantage of Quick Sync Video to speed up video processing, which explains why those two Macs perform so much better on this one test than the new Mac Pro.ДЄpple updated its professional video editing application, Final Cut Pro X, to take advantage of the new Mac Pro hardware. The Xeon processors in the new Mac Pro do not. Both the iMac and MacBook Pro use Intel Core processors that include Intel Quick Sync VideoвЂ™s hardware acceleration support. Update: As was pointed out to us by a couple of astute Macworld readers, the reason for the performance difference lies with IntelвЂ™s Quick Sync Video technology. The new Mac Pro was the fastest Mac Pro in that test, but at 170 seconds, it lagged well behind the Retina MacBook ProвЂ™s 63-second result and the CTO iMacвЂ™s very impressive 47-second time. Rendering the project after applying the effects and analyzing the color took 80 seconds on that Retina MacBook Pro, but just under 40 seconds on the new Mac Pro.

#6 CORE MAC PRO VS 8 CORE FOR AFTER EFFECTS 720P#

We use iMovieвЂ™s Enhance feature and exported as a 720p movie. The strangest result was our iMovie test that uses some iPhone 5s slo-mo video footage.

The new Mac Pro did well on graphics tests, especially compared to the older Mac Pros, but the 27-inch iMacвЂ™s Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M with 4GB of RAM performed a bit better in one test (CinebenchвЂ™s GPU benchmark) than the workstation-class D700 graphics in the new Mac Pro.

6 core mac pro vs 8 core for after effects